The Wall Street Journal
San Antonio Express News
Justia Lawyer Rating
Lawyers with Purpose
Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent
American Academy of Attorney-CPAs
Texas Bar College
National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, Inc
Medicaid Practice Network
Expertise - Best Probate Attorneys in Houston
Super Lawyers
Senior Resource Guides - Best of 2020
Lawyers of Distinction

A retiree who gives to a church, a university, or a local charity by writing a check is using after-tax dollars and then hoping the deduction survives the return. There is a different route for anyone who has reached 70½ and holds an individual retirement account. The money can go straight from the IRA to the charity, and it never appears in taxable income at all.

That route is the qualified charitable distribution. For a Texas retiree who takes the standard deduction, a QCD is often worth more than the same gift made by check, because the tax benefit does not depend on itemizing. It became more valuable for the 2026 tax year, when a new floor started limiting charitable deductions that a QCD sidesteps entirely. McCulloch & Miller advises Dallas and Houston families on charitable planning, and this is the tool that fits the largest number of ordinary retirees.

How a Qualified Charitable Distribution Works in Texas

A qualified charitable distribution is a payment made directly by an IRA trustee to a qualifying charity on behalf of an account owner who has reached age 70½, excluded from the owner’s gross income up to an annual cap. The definition sits in 26 U.S.C. § 408(d)(8).

Two mechanics do the work. First, the transfer has to be made directly by the trustee under § 408(d)(8)(B)(i). A distribution paid to the account owner who then writes a check to the charity is an ordinary taxable distribution, and the sequence cannot be repaired afterward. Second, § 408(d)(8)(D) turns off the usual proportional rule for IRAs with after-tax money in them, so the QCD is treated as coming from the pre-tax portion first.

Continue reading

Most people who inherit a parent’s IRA are told one thing about it, which is that the account has to be emptied within 10 years. That is part of the rule and not all of it. For a large group of beneficiaries, a withdrawal is also required in each of the years along the way, and skipping those years does not simply postpone the tax.

The inherited IRA rules in Texas are federal, and the current version comes from Treasury regulations finalized in 2024 that apply to required minimum distributions for calendar years beginning on or after January 1, 2025. The annual requirement does not reach every beneficiary. It turns on when the original owner died relative to that owner’s required beginning date, and on which category the beneficiary falls into. McCulloch & Miller works with Houston families on estate planning where retirement accounts are often the largest asset passing to the next generation.

Inherited IRA Rules in Texas After the Final Regulations

An inherited IRA is a retirement account that passes to a beneficiary at the owner’s death and is retitled for that beneficiary, who must withdraw the balance under a schedule set by federal law rather than leaving it in place indefinitely.

Continue reading

A hospital stay that ends in a transfer to a skilled nursing facility puts most families in contact with Medicare’s rehabilitation benefit for the first time. The coverage is genuine but narrow, and it rests on conditions decided during the hospital stay rather than at the nursing home. By the time someone is told coverage is ending, the facts that decided it are already fixed.

Medicare nursing home coverage in Texas runs under Part A as what the statute calls post-hospital extended care services, and two limits account for most of the denials families encounter. The stay has to follow a qualifying hospital admission, and the benefit is capped at 100 days per spell of illness under 42 U.S.C. § 1395d(a)(2)(A). Neither limit is within the facility’s discretion. McCulloch & Miller works with families in Austin, Houston, and across Texas on Texas elder law questions that begin at exactly this moment.

What Medicare Nursing Home Coverage in Texas Pays For

Post-hospital extended care services are skilled nursing or rehabilitation services furnished in a skilled nursing facility after a qualifying transfer from a hospital, covered by Medicare Part A for a limited number of days rather than as ongoing long-term care.

Continue reading

A successor trustee usually starts the job during a funeral week, holding a document nobody has read closely in years. The authority arrives immediately and without a court appointment, which is the advantage of a trust and also the reason the role catches people unprepared. Nothing formal marks the beginning.

Successor trustee duties in Texas begin with a fiduciary obligation that is broader than the trust document describes. Under Texas Property Code § 113.051, a trustee shall administer the trust in good faith according to its terms, and absent contrary terms shall perform all of the duties imposed on trustees by the common law. A great deal of what a trustee owes therefore never appears in the instrument at all. McCulloch & Miller advises trustees on trust administration in Austin, Houston, and across Texas.

Families in Dallas County raising a child with a disability face a planning problem with two common answers that are not interchangeable. An ABLE account and a special needs trust both hold money for a person with a disability without costing that person Supplemental Security Income and Medicaid. They operate under different bodies of law, carry different ceilings, and end very differently when the beneficiary dies.

The federal Medicaid statute is what makes a special needs trust work. Under 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(A), a trust holding the assets of an individual under age 65 who is disabled is treated differently from an ordinary trust, provided it was established for that individual’s benefit by a permitted person and the State is repaid at the beneficiary’s death, up to what Medicaid spent, from whatever remains. An ABLE account comes from the tax code instead, at 26 U.S.C. § 529A, and its constraints are dollar constraints rather than structural ones.

A block of stock purchased decades ago and never sold carries a cost basis that bears no relation to what the shares are worth today. Retirees across Dallas County hold positions like this in a former employer’s shares or in an energy company bought when the certificate still arrived by mail. Selling to diversify or to generate retirement income realizes the entire appreciation at once, and Texas having no state income tax leaves the federal exposure untouched.

A charitable remainder trust is an irrevocable split-interest trust that pays an income stream to one or more non-charitable beneficiaries for a set period and then distributes what remains to charity. Because the trust is generally tax-exempt, appreciated stock contributed to it may be sold inside the trust without the donor recognizing gain at the moment of sale.

The Texas Estates Code defines an adult as an individual 18 years of age or older, and it draws no exception for disability. On that birthday, a parent in Austin or anywhere else in Texas stops being the automatic legal decision maker for a son or daughter. Medical providers, banks, benefits offices, and colleges may begin dealing with the new adult directly, and a parent who calls to ask a routine question can be turned away.

Guardianship is not the default answer under Texas law. A court must weigh the guardianship alternatives for a Texas adult child before it may appoint anyone at all. Under Texas Estates Code § 1101.101(a)(1)(D) and (E), a court must find by clear and convincing evidence that alternatives to guardianship, and the supports and services available to the proposed ward, were considered and determined not to be feasible before it appoints a guardian. The alternative most families are never told about is the supported decision-making agreement, created by Chapter 1357 of the Texas Estates Code.

Chapter 48 of the Texas Human Resources Code governs the financial exploitation of older adults and adults with disabilities. It supplies a statutory definition, imposes a reporting duty that reaches every person in the state, and makes a knowing failure to report a criminal offense. For families in Houston and across Harris, Fort Bend, Montgomery, and Brazoria counties, that chapter is where a suspicion about a parent’s bank account meets a defined legal process, and it is a recurring issue in Texas elder law.

Texas Human Resources Code § 48.002(3) defines exploitation to include the improper use of an elderly person’s resources by a caretaker, family member, or other individual who has an ongoing relationship with that person, without informed consent. Section 48.051(a) then requires a person who has cause to believe that an elderly person is in a state of exploitation to report it immediately. That duty falls on any person, not only on licensed professionals.

Texas applies a hard income cap to Medicaid long-term care benefits, which separates it from most states. An applicant whose gross monthly income sits above the state’s special income limit is denied, even when that income covers a fraction of a Houston nursing home bill and nothing is left over. Families across Harris County usually learn this after a parent has already moved into a facility, and the denial notice rarely explains what comes next.

Federal law supplies the answer. Income routed each month into a trust that satisfies 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(B) is disregarded when Texas measures an applicant against the income limit, so the same person denied last month can qualify with the trust in place. The trust does not shelter savings or reduce what the facility is owed. It removes one specific barrier, the one that stops most applicants. Texas Medicaid crisis planning often begins and ends with getting this document right.

Federal Medicaid law treats a married couple differently from a single applicant the moment one spouse enters a nursing facility. The governing provisions are the spousal impoverishment rules at 42 U.S.C. § 1396r-5, and they decide how much of a Houston couple’s savings and monthly income the spouse who stays at home may keep while the other qualifies for long-term care coverage. What is at stake is the financial survival of the spouse who remains at home.

Congress wrote those rules so that no family would have to be reduced to nothing to get a husband or wife into care. Section 1396r-5 splits the couple into an institutionalized spouse and a community spouse, protects a share of the couple’s countable resources for the community spouse, and allows part of the institutionalized spouse’s monthly income to be diverted to the community spouse when that spouse’s own income falls below a federal floor. Texas administers the calculation through its own eligibility rules, but the architecture is federal, which is why Medicaid crisis planning in Texas begins with those same two definitions.

Contact Information