A recent opinion from the Fifth Court of Appeals, In the Estate of Danny Lee Rubey, offers helpful guidance for families facing a will contest in the Dallas area. In that case, the court affirmed summary judgment against a will challenger who claimed the decedent lacked testamentary capacity and was subject to undue influence, fraud, and unjust enrichment. The ruling shows how Texas courts evaluate these disputes and which types of evidence carry real weight. It also highlights how thoughtful estate planning and clear communication can reduce the risk of litigation later.
Will contests create strain for families, especially when disagreements arise soon after a loved one passes. Understanding how courts examine these challenges helps families make informed decisions during both planning and probate.
How Dallas Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity
Testamentary capacity focuses on the mental ability of the person signing the will. Texas courts look at whether the testator understood the nature of making a will, the general extent of their property, and the natural objects of their bounty. The court in Rubey emphasized that capacity is assessed at the moment the will is executed. Medical records, witness statements, and attorney notes can support or undermine a challenge.
Houston Estate Planning and Elder Law Attorney Blog










